Archives
- November 2009 (100)
Categories
- 2009 TOPICS (1)
- My CAMERA EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD COMMENTS (97)
- Abstinence-only funding (1)
- After Justice Souter (1)
- American workers' vacations (1)
- Anonymity online (2)
- Being a patriot (1)
- Boulder in 150 years (1)
- Broomfield 2007 issues (1)
- Bruce Benson at CU (1)
- Building green (1)
- BVSD and wellness (1)
- BVSD Helayne Jones (1)
- BVSD more 'eyes' (1)
- BVSD open meetings (1)
- BVSD Teacher pay (1)
- Campaign finance (1)
- Capitalism vs. socialism (1)
- Cash for clunkers (1)
- CEO compensation (1)
- Checklist for Obama (1)
- Child rapist law (1)
- Christmas (1)
- Coal and Clean Air Act (1)
- Code enforcement (1)
- Comfort FLDS children (1)
- Court ban on "rape" (1)
- CU and concealed guns (1)
- CU and height limits (1)
- CU conservative chair (1)
- CU reading days (1)
- CU standardized testing (1)
- CU student fees (1)
- CU Title IX settlement (1)
- D.A. Stan Garnett (1)
- Deadly side of bullying (1)
- DNC 2008 (1)
- Elections 2008 (1)
- FasTracks (1)
- Father's Day (2)
- Fees on Open Space (1)
- Feral cats (1)
- Gas guzzler legislation (1)
- GMOs on Open Space (1)
- Good old days (1)
- Government cameras (1)
- Graffiti vandals (1)
- Gun bans (1)
- H.S. English (1)
- H.S. senior 'prank' (1)
- Harsh interrogations (1)
- Health care reform (1)
- Hunting (1)
- Illegal aliens (1)
- Impeachment of Bush (1)
- In-state tuition (1)
- Jewish eruv in Boulder (1)
- Mail-in voting (1)
- Marijuana (1)
- Medicaid cuts (1)
- Michael Jackson (1)
- Midyettes (1)
- Newspapers (1)
- Non-citizens on boards (1)
- Obama and earmarks (1)
- Political races 2008 (1)
- Preserving history (2)
- Privacy (3)
- Public discourse (1)
- Public nudity laws (1)
- Questions for Pres. (1)
- Religion in politics (1)
- Same-sex marriage (1)
- Saving pets in cars (1)
- Scare wild animals (1)
- Search/rescue funding (1)
- Sexism and racisim (1)
- Sexual predator label (1)
- Smoking facts (1)
- Sonia Sotomayor (1)
- Spreading wealth (1)
- Stimulus package flaw (1)
- Strides at Angevine (1)
- Susan Boyle (1)
- Thanksgiving (1)
- Trading with Cuba (1)
- Transit Village (1)
- Two-party system (1)
- U.S. Constitution (1)
- Value of babies (1)
- Ward Churchill (1)
- Wash. Elem. lessons (1)
- Year-round schooling (1)
- STUDENT AND FAMILY PRIVACY (4)
- BVSD example (1)
- Database privacy bane (1)
- Freshman questions (1)
- Policy (1)
Pages
Email Blog Subscription
Levy’s proposed legislation on gas guzzlers needs work*
November 5, 2009 by shirleyscoville
My Camera Editorial Advisory Board comment published on Dec. 1, 2007:
Rep. Claire Levy’s legislation proposal to impose a “gas guzzler” tax at time of purchase in the range of $80 to $100 needs to be rethought or scrapped altogether.
As planned, the money would boost revenues for the Office of Smart Growth that was created when the General Assembly passed HB 00-1427 into law in 2000.
Though Levy seems to think more money and more government will help, communities addressing growth and sprawl need to discuss the issues among their own members, not necessarily call for more money. Still, where money matters, the office’s two employees “provide direct technical and financial assistance to local governments in the areas of land use planning and growth management,” which is the office’s mission.
The office has given out $1.8 million since 2000. The proposed tax, if passed, would definitely bring in a few one-time dollars from drivers of the least fuel-efficient luxury cars with names that include Lamborghini, Bentley, Ferrari, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, Cadillac, Audi and even Volkswagen, Chrysler, Toyota and Ford.
Estimated fuel efficiencies in the worst cases of this group start at single digits for in-town driving and in the low teens for highway driving. The best ones go only as high as the upper teens for in-town and highway driving. However, for their drivers, what these cars lack in fuel efficiency, they make up for in power and looks.
They definitely turn heads and cause a little envy in some, too.
In spite of any ulterior motives some may have, it’s reasonable that those who use more gas and pollute more, pay a little more to help out the environment. Since luxury cars and SUVs use more gas, a logical and fair way would be to collect a tax at the pump rather than once at purchase.
Forbes.com posted a list, “2007 Top Gas Guzzlers,” that sheds light on what drivers of fuel-inefficient cars may pay yearly at the pump. The least fuel-efficient cars can pay in the neighborhood of $2,360 to $3,500 for gas a year. In contrast, those driving more fuel-efficient cars such as the Honda Insight, Toyota Prius, Ford Escape Hybrid and Honda Odyssey, spend between $500 and $1,500, according to Forbes.com. That sounds like justice for those driving more fuel-efficient cars.
Instead of attempting to change the environmental standards at the state level with Levy’s proposed legislation, efforts would be better spent to get the Environmental Protection Agency to rework the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, or CAFE, to toughen fuel-efficiency standards on SUVs or make the automakers pay the price.
Right now, families wanting to buy a minivan are faced with limited fuel-efficient choices as are those working farms or needing a four-wheel drive vehicle to get to and from work.
*This title was not part of the original Camera publication.
Posted in Gas guzzler legislation, My CAMERA EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD COMMENTS | Tagged gas_guzzlers | No Comments Yet
Comments RSS